State v. Mike
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtLarkin, Judge
In this pretrial appeal, the state challenges the district court's order suppressing blood-test results and dismissing driving-while-impaired (DWI) charges. The order was based on the state's failures to provide respondent-driver an opportunity to consult with an attorney before submitting to testing pursuant to a search warrant and to advise respondent-driver that refusal to submit to a blood test is a crime. The district court also reasoned that suppression was required on due-process grounds. Because respondent-driver did not have a right to consult with an attorney, the state's failure to…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Birchfield v. N. Dakota. William Robert BernardSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Friedman v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
- State v. HannukselaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Christianson v. HenkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
- McDonnell v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Brian Matthew Nash v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2024
- Brian Matthew Nash v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2024
- Jensen v. Comm'r SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2019