Legal Opinion

State v. Mike

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 27, 2018No. A18-0730PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLarkin, Judge

In this pretrial appeal, the state challenges the district court's order suppressing blood-test results and dismissing driving-while-impaired (DWI) charges. The order was based on the state's failures to provide respondent-driver an opportunity to consult with an attorney before submitting to testing pursuant to a search warrant and to advise respondent-driver that refusal to submit to a blood test is a crime. The district court also reasoned that suppression was required on due-process grounds. Because respondent-driver did not have a right to consult with an attorney, the state's failure to…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Birchfield v. N. Dakota. William Robert BernardSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  2. Friedman v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
  3. State v. HannukselaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  4. Christianson v. HenkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
  5. McDonnell v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Brian Matthew Nash v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2024
  2. Brian Matthew Nash v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2024
  3. Jensen v. Comm'r SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API