Legal Opinion

Airport Industrial Park, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided January 16, 2004No. 02-1077 CPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HEWITT, Judge.

Plaintiff filed this suit on August 28, 2002 alleging that defendant United States wrongfully terminated plaintiffs contract for work in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Complaint (Compl.) UH 5, 7, ll.1 Defendant moved for *333summary judgment on September 11, 2003, stating that plaintiffs “failure to obtain necessary bonding justifie[d] a termination for default.” Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (defendant’s motion or MSJ) at 6. Defendant’s motion has been fully briefed by both parties. For the reasons discussed below, the court GRANTS defendant’s motion.

I. Background

The…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Sweats Fashions, Inc. v. Pannill Knitting Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
  3. Dairyland Power Cooperative v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
  4. Coast Federal Bank, Fsb v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
  5. Mark Smith Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Keeter Trading Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  2. Precision Pine & Timber, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
  3. Pinckney v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  4. Lanterman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  5. Allen Engineering Contractor, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API