Legal Opinion
Lanterman v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided March 20, 2007No. 06-302CPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRUGGINK, Judge.
This is a pro se action brought by plaintiff, George Richard Lanterman, Jr. He claims that the United States Postal Service’s termination for default of his contract for postal box delivery services was a breach of contract. Plaintiff filed suit in this court for damages for the alleged breach in the amount of $500,000. Pending now is defendant’s motion for summary judgment.
Plaintiff has not responded to defendant’s motion. The court contacted plaintiff by email to inform him that his response to the motion was overdue and that he should file his response as soon as…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Sweats Fashions, Inc. v. Pannill Knitting Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Dairyland Power Cooperative v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Lisbon Contractors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Flexfab, L.L.C. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Keeter Trading Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- United Partition Systems, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- American Medical Equipment, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022
- Cherokee General Corporation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020
- Marine Industrial Construction, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.