Legal Opinion

Auld v. Schmelz

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 3, 1945No. 15140PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

1. If the pleadings are so defective that no legal judgment can be rendered, the judgment will be arrested or set aside. But a judgment will not be arrested or set aside for any defect in the pleading or record that is aided by verdict, or amendable as matter of form. Code, §§ 110-702, 110-704, 110-705; Worthy v. Farmers Life Confederation, 139 Ga. 81 (76 S.E. 856).

2. The prayers contained in the defendant's answer and amendments, considered with the plaintiff's petition, were sufficient as a matter of pleading to support the money verdict in favor of the defendant against the plaintiff,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Haynes v. Armour Fertilizer WorksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1917
  2. Rollins v. Personal Finance Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
  3. Mell v. McNultySupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  4. Fitzpatrick v. PauldingSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
  5. Lanier v. HuguleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1893

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Windsor Forest, Inc. v. RockerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  2. Auld v. SchmelzSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
  3. Armstrong v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
  4. Wright v. Florida-Georgia Tractor Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1963
  5. Nichols v. NicholsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1953

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API