Haynes v. Armour Fertilizer Works
Supreme Court of Georgia
Claim. Before Judge Littlejohn. Lee superior court. February 17, 1916.
1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, J.
The “Armour Fertilizer Works” brought suit against Mrs. C. H. Tyson and others, in the city court of Leesburg, and obtained a judgment. There were no descriptive words to explain whether the “Armour Fertilizer Works” was a corporation, or other legal entity. Execution issued accordingly in favor of “Armour Fertilizer Works,” and was levied upon real estate. The real estate was claimed by the plaintiffs in error. The claim was based on the contention that the name “Armour Fertilizer Works” was not such as to import a corporation or other legal entity, that there were no descriptive averments,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Western & Atlantic Railroad v. Dalton Marble WorksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Wheeler v. MartinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
- Ansley Co. v. O'ByrneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Anderson v. BrumbySupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
- Horne v. PowellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Eslinger v. HerndonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
- Pedigo v. Celanese Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
- Smith v. Commissioners of Roads & RevenueSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
- Patterson v. Duron Paints of Georgia, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
- Orange County Trust Company v. Estate of Abe TakowskyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.