Legal Opinion

Wright v. Florida-Georgia Tractor Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 4, 1963No. 21946PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Quillian, Justice.

Ground 1 of the motion in arrest of judgment presents the contention that the judgment entered upon the eventual condemnation money bond against the movants and their principal is void because it does not conform with the verdict returned in the case, the judgment being for the recovery of money, while, as the movant contends, the verdict is not a “money verdict.”

The petition filed by Altman, the movants’ principal, in which he prayed and was granted an injunction to prevent the Tractor Company from proceeding with the foreclosure of a bill of sale and the defendant’s answer…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Ray v. Home & Foreign Investment & Agency Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  2. Eagan v. ConwaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  3. Jordan v. Callaway & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1912
  4. Mell v. McNultySupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  5. Fitzpatrick v. PauldingSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Brown v. Techdata Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1977
  2. Windsor Forest, Inc. v. RockerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  3. Betts v. First Georgia BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  4. Simonds v. SimondsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API