Legal Opinion

Mell v. McNulty

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 12, 1938No. 12120PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jenkins, Justice.

1. “Creditors . . may attack a judgment for any defect appearing on the face of the record or pleadings, or for fraud or collusion, whenever it interferes with their rights, either at law or in equity.” Code, § 110-711. “When a judgment has been rendered, either party may move in arrest thereof, or to set it aside for any defect not amendable which appears on the face of the record or pleadings.” § 110-702. The right of a creditor, under § 110-711, to attack the judgment of another creditor because of an alleged “defect appearing on the face of the record or pleadings” does…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Winn v. LunsfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
  2. Barclay v. KimseySupreme Court of Georgia · 1884
  3. Chapman v. TaliaferroCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  4. Stanford & Golden v. BradfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1872
  5. Rollins v. Personal Finance Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1934

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Barbee v. BarbeeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
  2. Sangster v. Toledo Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1942
  3. Rahal v. TitusCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
  4. Adams v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
  5. Hinkle v. HinkleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1953

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API