Legal Opinion

Nichols v. Nichols

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 8, 1953No. 18219PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Head, Justice.

1. An amendment to the wife’s petition, alleging that the child of the parties had been born subsequently to the filing of the divorce action, and praying for permanent alimony for the support of the child, would have been germane to her action for divorce and alimony. Any lack of pleadings or prayers was cured by the judgment and decree, and that part of the judgment awarding alimony for the minor child is not void. Auld v. Schmelz, 199 Ga. 633 (2) (34 S. E. 2d, 860); Barbee v. Barbee, 201 Ga. 763, 768 (41 S. E. 2d, 126); Armstrong v. Armstrong, 206 Ga. 540 (57 S. E. 2d, 668);…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Barbee v. BarbeeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
  2. Mell v. McNultySupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  3. Auld v. SchmelzSupreme Court of Georgia · 1945
  4. Moss & Co. v. StokeleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
  5. Armstrong v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Windsor Forest, Inc. v. RockerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  2. Bragg v. BraggSupreme Court of Georgia · 1968
  3. Simonds v. SimondsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API