Legal Opinion

State v. Thomas

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 3, 1981No. C 80-03-30927; CA 18272PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButtler, P. J.

Defendant appeals his conviction of Rape in the First Degree (ORS 163.375), assigning error to the trial court’s ruling permitting (more accurately, requiring) defense counsel to testify on rebuttal for the state. He contends that he was denied the right to a fair trial and to the effective assistance of counsel under both the United States 1 and Oregon 2 Constitutions. For the reasons hereafter stated, we conclude there was error, but that it was invited, and that the questions now presented cannot be raised on direct appeal. Accordingly, we affirm.

Defendant, in the company of a friend,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wardius v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. State v. SullivanWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  3. State v. WardiusCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
  4. State v. LivingstonOhio Court of Appeals · 1972
  5. State v. CrissmanOhio Court of Appeals · 1971

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Flores v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
  2. Venable v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  3. State v. EdblomCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  4. Flores v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
  5. Flores, Ramiro Jr.Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API