Legal Opinion

Venable v. State

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 29, 1996No. 570PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURPHY, Judge.

In the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, a jury convicted Marlene Venable, appellant, of distribution of cocaine and related offenses. Her appeal presents us with but one question:

Did the trial court err in permitting the State to call defense counsel as a rebuttal witness?

We answer “yes” to that question, reverse the judgments of conviction, and remand this case for a new trial.

Background

In the early morning of September 17, 1993, Officers Roundtree and Wells of the Baltimore Housing Authority Police conducted a surveillance of the Somerset Projects, and observed appellant…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ullmann v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  2. State v. SullivanWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  3. State v. LloydCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  4. Rudolph v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
  5. People v. LathromCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. ReganCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  2. State v. ReganCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  3. Flores v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
  4. State v. GoldsberryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
  5. Flores v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API