Venable v. State
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
MURPHY, Judge.
In the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, a jury convicted Marlene Venable, appellant, of distribution of cocaine and related offenses. Her appeal presents us with but one question:
Did the trial court err in permitting the State to call defense counsel as a rebuttal witness?
We answer “yes” to that question, reverse the judgments of conviction, and remand this case for a new trial.
Background
In the early morning of September 17, 1993, Officers Roundtree and Wells of the Baltimore Housing Authority Police conducted a surveillance of the Somerset Projects, and observed appellant…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ullmann v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- State v. SullivanWashington Supreme Court · 1962
- State v. LloydCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1981
- Rudolph v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
- People v. LathromCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. ReganCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- State v. ReganCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- Flores v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
- State v. GoldsberryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
- Flores v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.