Legal Opinion

Flores v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided December 15, 2004No. PD-1908-02Published

1Opinion of the Court

155 S.W.3d 144 (2004)

Ramiro FLORES, Jr., Appellant,

v.

The STATE of Texas.

No. PD-1908-02.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

December 15, 2004.

M. Patrick Maguire, Kerrville, for Appellant.

E. Bruce Curry, District Attorney, Kerrville, Matthew Paul, State's Attorney, Austin, for State.

OPINION

HOLCOMB, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which KELLER, P.J., and MEYERS, WOMACK, HERVEY, and COCHRAN, JJ., joined.

The issue we decide today is whether, absent a compelling need for the testimony, it is error to order defense counsel to testify over objection when called by the State as a fact…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Monreal v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  3. Bray v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
  4. Ullmann v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  5. United States v. Frank G. PrantilCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API