State v. Crissman
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtLynch, J.
Defendant, appellant herein, is appealing his conviction by a jury of the crimes of incest, prohibited by R. C. 2905.07, with his daughter Judy Crissman, and of having carnal knowledge of Judy Crissman, a female under sixteen, with her consent, contrary to R. C. 2905.03. Both crimes were alleged to have been committed on March 2, 1967. Defendant was sentenced from one to ten years on the incest charge and from one to twenty years on the statutory rape charge, with the sentences to run consecutively. Defendant had been previously convicted on the same charges, but the trial court set aside the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Marshall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- State v. DeZelerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- State v. HilliardArizona Supreme Court · 1961
- State v. AdamoWashington Supreme Court · 1924
- Kitts v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1951
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BaileyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
- United States v. SandovalUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1984
- State v. LocklearSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- State v. VandenbergCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
- Ray v. Gallant-Belk Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.