Legal Opinion

Wm. Esser & Co. v. Industrial Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1926PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDoerfler, J.

There was in force at all times involved herein, a safety order of the Industrial Commission known as No. 3509, which provides as follows:

“All openings in floors, whether such floors are temporary or permanent, shall be inclosed with' substantial temporary railings riot less than thirty-six inches high. A solid toe-board not less than seven inches in height shall be provided around such openings. Such railings shall be constructed by the contractor who constructs the temporary or permanent floor, and shall be constructed as soon as the floor around the opening is put in place, and shall be…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lewis v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Scott & Howe Lumber Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Carey v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Creamery Package Manufacturing Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Umnus v. Wisconsin Public Service Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Reichert v. Rex Accessories Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Tewes v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Smith v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1945

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API