Umnus v. Wisconsin Public Service Corp.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
Defendant submits that there was no need to erect rails or guards around as large an opening as this one, surrounded by so large a safe work space and therefore, as a matter of law, there was no breach of the safe-place statute. It is contended that the danger was so open and obvious that no guard was necessary. We do not find that the statute distinguishes between obvious and hidden dangers. It is clear that the opening constituted a danger and there is plenty of evidence in the record that it was practicable to guard it with a rail, that such a rail would have made the *437place of Umnus’…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Neitzke v. Kraft-Phenix Dairies, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
- Criswell v. Seaman Body Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
- Guderyon v. Wisconsin Telephone Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1942
- Smith v. City of Green BayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
- Prunty v. VandenbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 1950
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Potter v. City of KenoshaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
- Presser v. Siesel Construction Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- Tucci & Sons, Inc. v. Carl T. Madsen, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1970
- Montoya v. Greenway Aluminum Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1974
- Mustas v. INLAND CONSTRUCTION, INC.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.