Legal Opinion

Lewis v. Industrial Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 10, 1922PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVinje, C. J.

The Commission found these facts:

“Joseph Lewis had been employed by the respondent for many years. During the summer, of 1921 and particularly during the time prior to July 7, 1921, there was a lull in the work at the coal yard, but the crew was kept together at ‘tinkering’ about the yard in order to keep the crew together. The evidence is quite convincing that on July 6th and also on the 7th the men did very little work. On the 6th, after putting in the full day but working only about an hour, the men were permitted to return and to leave their work at four in the afternoon and to come back…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Milwaukee Western Fuel Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1915
  2. City of Milwaukee v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Hoenig v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1915
  4. International Harvester Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Northwestern Iron Co. v. Indusrrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Ronning v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Medina v. New Mexico Consolidated Min. Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Mrs. Drenk's Foods, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Tewes v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Eagle River Building & Supply Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API