Legal Opinion
Carey v. Industrial Commission
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided June 18, 1923PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, J.
In his opinion the trial court said:
“Here, in my opinion, is a case where different reasonable inferences can be drawn from the undisputed facts, and the inferences drawn by the Commission, having a sufficient basis in the evidence, cannot be disturbed by the court, the findings having all the conclusive effect of findings on conflicting evidence. Lewis v. Industrial Comm. 178 Wis. 449, 190 N. W. 101.”
It is contended by the plaintiff that, the facts being undisputed, the question of whether or not the plaintiff is entitled to compensation is a question of law. This court early adopted the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hoenig v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1915
- Central Illinois Public Service Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1920
- Village of Weyauwega v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
- Lewis v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
3Cited by9 opinions
- John H. Kaiser Lumber Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
- Slanina v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1927
- Baker v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Eagle River Building & Supply Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929
- Wm. Esser & Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.