Legal Opinion
In Re Panel File Number 99-5
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided March 2, 2000No. C5-99-1464PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Respondent, identified as Panel File No. 99-5, represented Bio-Recovery Inc. (client) in a breach of contract action. In anticipation of a scheduling and settlement conference, his client advised respondent that it wished to reach a settlement at the conference and included proposed settlement terms. Respondent did not communicate the settlement offer to the magistrate or opposing counsel at the conference. Five months later the lawsuit settled, a dispute over respondent’s fees ensued and his client filed a complaint with the Lawyers Professional *430Responsibility Board (LPRB) alleging…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- Matter of Disciplinary Act. Against WeyhrichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against RuhlandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against WalkerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Matter of Discipline of SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against KleinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
4Cited by6 opinions
- In Re Charges of Unprofessional Conduct in Panel Case No. 23236Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- In Re Panel Case No. 17289Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- In re Charges of Unprofessional Conduct in Panel File No. 41755Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2018
- In Re Panel File Number 99-5Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST A.B., a Minnesota Attorney, Panel Case No. 35121Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.