Legal Opinion

In Re Panel File Number 99-5

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 2, 2000No. C5-99-1464Published

1Opinion of the Court

607 N.W.2d 429 (2000)

In re PANEL FILE NUMBER 99-5.

No. C5-99-1464.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

March 2, 2000.

Rehearing Denied April 3, 2000.

Alfred Milton Stanbury, Minneapolis, for appellant.

Timothy Michael Burke, Senior Asst. Director, Edward J. Cleary, Director, Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility, St. Paul, for respondent.

Considered and decided by the court en banc without oral argument.

OPINION

2Per curiam

Respondent, identified as Panel File No. 99-5, represented Bio-Recovery Inc. (client) in a breach of contract action. In anticipation of a scheduling and settlement conference, his client…

3Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Matter of Disciplinary Act. Against WeyhrichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  2. In Re Disciplinary Action Against RuhlandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  3. In Re Disciplinary Action Against WalkerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  4. Matter of Discipline of SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  5. In Re Disciplinary Action Against KleinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API