Legal Opinion

Supove v. Densmoor Et Ux

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 11, 1961PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHowell, J.

(Pro Tempore)

Plaintiff Supove brought this action to recover the reasonable value of his services for drafting plans for the defendants for the construction of a garage building. The defendants interposed an equitable defense. Prom a decree entered in favor of defendants, plaintiffs appeal.

Plaintiff Supove is an engineer and plaintiff Sunderland, a building contractor. The defendants Dens-moor, husband and wife, are partners in the operation of a Chevrolet agency. As they were represented by Mr. Densmoor, he will be referred to as the defendant.

The defendant, who was interested in the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cook v. MichaelOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Pacific General Contractors, Inc. v. Slate Construction Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Heise v. Pilot Rock Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Weatherford v. WEATHERFORDOregon Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Brown v. BriggsOregon Supreme Court · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. In Re Welfare of SegoWashington Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Department of Social & Health Services v. JonesWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Slomowitz v. WalkerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  4. In re the Detention of M.K.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  5. In re the Parental Rights to K.M.M.Washington Supreme Court · 2016

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API