Legal Opinion
United States v. Gansman
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided September 9, 2011No. 10-731PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOSÉ A. CABRANES, Circuit Judge:
Defendant-appellant James Gansman (“defendant” or “Gansman”) appeals from a February 25, 2010 judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Miriam Goldman Cedarbaum, Judge) convicting him of insider trading under the so-called “misappropriation theory.” The Supreme Court has distinguished the misappropriation theory from the “classical” insider trading theory by explaining that “[i]n lieu of premising liability on a fiduciary relationship between company insider and purchaser or seller of the company’s stock, the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Victor v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. O'HaganSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Sims v. BlotCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- United States v. CoplanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- United States v. VilarCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
- United States v. GordonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. ObusCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- United States v. MartomaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.