United States v. Coplan
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Judge KEARSE dissents in part in a separate opinion.
JOSÉ A. CABRANES, Circuit Judge:
We consider here the fate of four partners and employees of Ernst & Young, LLP (“E & Y”), one of the largest accounting firms in the world, who appeal their convictions in connection with the development and defense of five “tax shelters” that were sold or implemented by E & Y between 1999 and 2001. At issue, among other things, is the scope of criminal liability in a conspiracy to defraud the United States under 18 U.S.C. § 371 and the sufficiency of the evidence with respect to the criminal intent of certain…
2Cases cited110 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Sullivan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
105 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by135 opinions
- United States v. VilarCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
- Porter v. QuarantilloCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
- United States v. MoroscoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016
- Commonwealth v. ParkerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- United States v. ValleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
130 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.