Legal Opinion

United States v. Coplan

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided November 29, 2012No. 10-583-cr(L)PublishedCited by 135 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judge KEARSE dissents in part in a separate opinion.

JOSÉ A. CABRANES, Circuit Judge:

We consider here the fate of four partners and employees of Ernst & Young, LLP (“E & Y”), one of the largest accounting firms in the world, who appeal their convictions in connection with the development and defense of five “tax shelters” that were sold or implemented by E & Y between 1999 and 2001. At issue, among other things, is the scope of criminal liability in a conspiracy to defraud the United States under 18 U.S.C. § 371 and the sufficiency of the evidence with respect to the criminal intent of certain…

2Cases cited110 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. Sullivan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946

105 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by135 opinions

  1. United States v. VilarCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
  2. Porter v. QuarantilloCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
  3. United States v. MoroscoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016
  4. Commonwealth v. ParkerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  5. United States v. ValleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015

130 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API