Legal Opinion

Victor v. Nebraska

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 16, 1994No. 92-8894PublishedCited by 1,392 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*5Justice O’Connor

delivered the opinion of the Court.*

The government must prove beyond a reasonable doubt every element of a charged offense. In re Winship, 397 U. S. 358 (1970). Although this standard is an ancient and honored aspect of our criminal justice system, it defies easy explication. In these cases, we consider the constitutionality of two attempts to define “reasonable doubt.”

I

The beyond a reasonable doubt standard is a requirement of due process, but the Constitution neither prohibits trial courts from defining reasonable doubt nor requires them to do so as a matter of course. Cf.…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Holland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  5. Ylst v. NunnemakerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1,392 opinions

  1. United States v. GaudinSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Tyler v. CainSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. People v. HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  5. Paulson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000

1,387 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API