Legal Opinion

United States v. Martoma

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided August 23, 2017No. Docket No. 14-3599; August Term, 2016PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judge Pooler dissents in a separate opinion.

Katzmann, Chief Judge:

Defendant-appellant Mathew Martoma was convicted, following a four-week jury trial, of one count of conspiracy to commit securities fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371 and two counts of securities fraud in violation of 15 U.S.C. §§ 78j(b) & 78ff in connection with an insider trading scheme. On appeal, Martoma argues that the jury was improperly instructed and that there was insufficient evidence to sustain his conviction.

Martoma's contentions focus on the "personal benefit" element of insider trading law. In Dirks v. S.E.C. ,…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Chiarella v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. United States v. MarcusSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  5. United States v. O'HaganSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Gupta v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
  2. United States v. CalderonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
  3. United States v. EldridgeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2021
  4. United States v. Pinto-ThomazDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
  5. United States v. KosinskiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2020

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API