Bank v. Sherron

The defense set up by the defendant is that the note sued on was procured by false and fraudulent representation and by disregard of the requirements of the “Blue-Sky Law,” and the defendant offered evidence to show that the plaintiff bank in this case acquired about the same time $15,000 or $20,000 of similar paper held by the Cumberland Eailway and Power Company, and that it had knowledge of the defects alleged.

There are numerous other exceptions assigned as error, but it is unnecessary to do more than, to mention the following evidence, which was excluded and its exclusion excepted to by…