Legal Opinion

Proctor v. Carolina Fertilizer & Phosphate Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 4, 1925PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClarksoN, J.

This case was before this Court on aZppeal by Jesse Eussell from a continuance of restraining order to the hearing, heard by Lyon, J., at Beaufort, 17 August, 1921, and is reported in 183 N. C., p. 153. This Court, Clark, C. J., writing the unanimous opinion, affirmed the judgment of the court below. The facts are fully set forth in that opinion and will not be repeated.

On the trial in the court below, the issues submitted to the jury, and their- answers thereto, were as follows:

“1. Was the execution of the note for $10,000 procured from the plaintiff by false and fraudulent misrepresentation…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. W. R. Grace & Co. v. StricklandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  2. State v. . AshburnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  3. Manufacturing Co. v. . SummersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  4. State v. . ReaganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  5. Bank of Zebulon v. ChambleeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Clark v. Laurel Park Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  2. Wood v. Citizens BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  3. Porter & Peck v. West Construction Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  4. William Whitman, Inc. v. YorkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  5. Price Real Estate & Insurance v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API