Legal Opinion

Fidelity Trust Co. v. Ellen

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 10, 1913PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from Justice, J., at November Term, 1912, of Nash.

1Opinion of the Court

Clare:, C. J.

This is one of the numerous actions upon notes given to McLaughlin Brothers for the purchase of an “imported French coach horse,” of which so many others are to' be found in the Reports of this State and also in those of other States. Attention is called to this in Winter v. Nobs, 19 Idaho, at page 28. Only one issue was submitted, “Are the defendants indebted to the plaintiff, and if so, in what amount?” The plaintiff did not tender any issues, nor except to this issue for failure to submit other issues.

There were exceptions to evidence, but they do not require consideration,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. American National Bank v. FountainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  2. Manufacturing Co. v. . SummersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  3. Park v. . ExumSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  4. Brink v. . BlackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1876

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Roberts v. HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. Merchants National Bank v. BransonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  3. Fidelity Trust Co. v. WhiteheadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  4. Bank v. SherronSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  5. Bank v. . SherronSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API