Legal Opinion
Commercial National Bank v. Wester
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided October 15, 1924PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtClarkson, J.
The issues submitted to the jury and their answers thereto are as follows:
“1. Was the execution of the two notes referred to in the pleadings procured by false and fraudulent representations as alleged in the answer of defendant? Answer: Yes.
“2. If so, did the plaintiff acquire said notes in due course for value, and before maturity, without actual notice of said false and fraudulent representations ? Answer: Yes.
“3. At the time of execution of said notes did the salesman of the Cumberland Eailway and Power Company deliver to the defendant a contract in accordance with section 6367 of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- American National Bank v. FountainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
- Manufacturing Co. v. . SummersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
- Smathers v. Toxaway Hotel Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
- Merchants National Bank v. BransonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
- Standard Trust Co. v. Commercial National BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Patterson v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- Proctor v. Carolina Fertilizer & Phosphate Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Andrews v. . ParksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939