Smathers v. Toxaway Hotel Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Appeal by Frank & Co., intervenors, from Ilarcling, J., at February Term, 1914, of BuNcombe.
1Opinion of the Court
“WalKER, J.
There are several of the exceptions in this record which are common to both this appeal and that of McMichael, which make it_ necessary to discuss only the assignment of error relating to the question, whether the court should have given the instruction requested by the intervenors, Frank & Oo., that if the jury believe the evidence, they will find that they are innocent purchasers for value and without notice of any fraud in the transaction connected therewith, or, in other words, that they are holders in due course, notwithstanding any infirmity in the instruments or any defect…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Canajoharie National Bank v. DiefendorfNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Vosburgh v. . DiefendorfNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Giberson v. JolleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- State v. Hill.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
- American National Bank v. FountainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Jerke v. Delmont State BankSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
- Kelly Springfield Tire Co. v. LesterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Clark v. Laurel Park Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
- Merchants National Bank v. PackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
- Building and Loan Association v. . SwaimSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.