Legal Opinion
Montgomery v. Carr
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided August 31, 1993No. C-1-93-562PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
HERMAN J. WEBBER, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Suzanne Montgomery and her husband Charles Montgomery bring this action through counsel under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that defendants violated their First Amendment right to freedom of association. Defendants are Dr. Harold Carr, the Chief Executive Officer of the Great Oaks Institute of Technology and Career Development (Great Oaks), and the Great Oaks Board of Education.
This matter is before the Court upon plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction (doc. no. 2), defendants’ response (doc. no. 8), defendants’ motion to dismiss (doe. no.…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- University of Texas v. CamenischSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Sampson v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Roberts v. United States JayceesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- CompuServe Inc. v. Cyber Promotions, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1997
- Montgomery v. CarrCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Montgomery v. CarrCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- NBBJ East Ltd. Partnership v. NBBJ Training Academy, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2001
- Becker v. GranholmDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.