Legal Opinion

Pritchett v. Jenkins

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 14, 1925No. 13805PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

SHACKELFORD, C.

The plaintiffs in error were the plaintiffs below, ana the defendants in error were the defendants. The parties will be referred to herein as plaintiffs and defendants ¡as they appeared in the court below.

The plaintiffs commenced this action in the district court of Cherokee county against the defendants, to -cancel instruments and to recover possession of lands described as:

“South 20 acres of lot 3, -and south half of northwest quarter and northeast quarter <>f northwest quarter of so-uithwest quarter of section one (1), township sixteen (36) north, range…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of BakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Winters v. Oklahoma Portland Cement Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Glory v. BagbySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  4. F. B. Collins Inv. Co. v. WaideSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  5. Gaines v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Oklahoma City v. Local Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  2. Special Indemnity Fund v. WeberSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  3. Rock Island Implement Co. v. PearseySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  4. Bagwell v. FinchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API