Legal Opinion
Special Indemnity Fund v. Weber
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided May 9, 1995No. 84013PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALMA WILSON, Chief Justice:
Two first impression questions are presented: 1) Should this review proceeding brought by the State Insurance Fund in the name of the Special Indemnity Fund be dismissed for want of standing? and 2) Does the five percent rate in 85 O.S.Supp.1992, § 173, effective September 1, 1992, apply to an award of permanent disability compensation entered after the effective date for a compen-sable injury that occurred prior to the effective date? We answer the first question in the negative and the second question in the affirmative. We conclude that the State Insurance Fund…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- United States v. JacobsSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Cate v. Archon Oil Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- Cleary Petroleum Corp. v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- Naylor v. Petuskey Ex Rel. District Court of Oklahoma CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- Peters v. Golden Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Boyd Rosene and Associates, Inc. v. Kansas Municipal Gas Agency, an Interlocal Municipal Agency City of Winfield, Kansas, a MunicipalityCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- Special Indemnity Fund v. MaplesCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1998
- Payne v. ArcherCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2000
- Valenti v. Special Indemnity FundCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2000
- Comerford v. Pryor FoundryCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.