Legal Opinion

Rock Island Implement Co. v. Pearsey

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 18, 1928No. 13156PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.

This action below was for possession of land, cancellation of 'guardian’s deed, and orders incident thereto and conveyances based thereon, and for quieting of-title.

The plaintiffs b'elow, defendants in error, are Chickasaw freedman and were allotted the lands in controversy. They were minors and residents of Love county, in February, 1912, and in the custody of their father, Tony Pearsey. On the named date a petition was filed in the county court of Love county for the appointment of a guardian of the estates of said minors. The petition contained allegations that said minors were residents…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Pettis v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. Roth v. Union Nat. Bank of BartlesvilleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Abraham v. HomerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  4. Hathaway v. HoffmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  5. Eaves v. MullenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. H. F. Wilcox Oil & Gas Co. v. WalkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  2. Jent v. JentSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  3. Weston v. PolandCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931
  4. Latimer v. VandersliceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  5. Sharp v. WhitneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API