Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Baker

California Supreme Court

Decided November 5, 1917No. L. A. No. 4833. Department OnePublishedCited by 35 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County revoking probate of a will. Curtis D. Wilbur, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] This is an appeal by Will D. Gould, as executor of the last will of Samuel F. Baker, deceased, and also as residuary legatee, under said will, from a judgment of the lower court revoking a previous order of that court admitting said will to probate.

Samuel F. Baker died on May 8, 1912. His will was admitted to probate by an order of the superior court made on May 24, 1912. The decedent left as his surviving heirs at law his brother Horace Baker, his sister Julia…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of BakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. State v. JonesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1870
  3. People v. McCarthyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Zellerbach v. AllenbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  5. People v. GriffinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Kennedy v. WalcuttOhio Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Estate of FosselmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Williams v. WallerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  4. MacFarlane v. FarwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  5. Carter v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API