Legal Opinion

Searle v. Milburn Irrigation Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 2006No. 20040406PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMENDED OPINION

DURRANT, Justice:

¶ 1 In this case, we are called upon to address several questions concerning the procedure applicable to the approval or rejection of applications proposing a change in water use. More specifically, we must determine whether the district court properly invoked the preponderance of the evidence standard of proof and correctly allocated the burden of proof when rejecting a change application. Additionally, we must decide whether a change applicant’s prima facie showing that no impairment of vested water rights will result from application approval can be…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. State v. PenaUtah Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. HansenUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Jeffs v. StubbsUtah Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State v. AndersonUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  5. State v. ClarkUtah Supreme Court · 2001

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. LevinUtah Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Haik v. Salt Lake City CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
  3. Wayment v. HowardUtah Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Western Water, LLC v. OldsUtah Supreme Court · 2008
  5. State v. CoxCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2012

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API