Legal Opinion
United States v. Gila Valley Irrigation District
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided March 23, 1996No. Globe Equity 59PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PHASE IV MEMORANDUM AND ORDER — AMENDED
COUGHENOUR, District Judge.
This is the fourth phase of the most recent round of litigation concerning the enforcement of the Globe Equity Consent Decree of June 29, 1935 (hereafter “Decree”) 1 for the benefit of the Gila River Indian Community (hereafter “GRIC”) and the San Carlos Apache Tribe (hereafter “Apache Tribe” or “Apaches”). The Court held trial November 7-17,1994 and heard closing arguments January 18, 1995. The Court heard evidence and argument related to the following issues:(1) whether the Apache Tribe’s rights to the natural flow of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. ITT Continental Baking Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Atchison v. PetersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Pacific Portland Cement Co. v. Food MacHinery & Chemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
- Arizona Copper Co. v. GillespieSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- United States v. Gila Valley Irrigation DistrictDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hopi Tribe v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Gila Valley Irrigation DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Standing Rock Sioux Tribe v. United States Army Corps of EngineersDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- San Carlos Apache Tribe v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2003
- United States v. Gila Valley Irrigation DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.