Legal Opinion

Whitmore v. Murray City

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 1944No. 6755PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WADE, Justice.

This is an appeal by plaintiff and appellant herein from a judgment of no cause of action.

A. 0. Whitmore, prior to his death, had filed a complaint seeking a declaratory judgment establishing the priority of a water filing for power purposes. Appellant has been substituted in this case as the executor of his last will.

On October 1, 1930, A. 0. Whitmore filed in the office of the state engineer an application, known as filing No. 10980, for the appropriation of 20 c. f. s. of water for power purposes on Little Cottonwood Creek in Salt Lake County, with the point of diversion a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Nichols v. McIntoshSupreme Court of Colorado · 1893
  2. Eardley v. TerryUtah Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Gray v. DefaUtah Supreme Court · 1943

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Green River Canal Co. v. ThaynUtah Supreme Court · 2003
  2. United States v. District Court of Fourth Judicial Dist. Ex Rel. Utah CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Utah Farm Bureau Ins. Co. v. ChuggUtah Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Berrett v. StevensUtah Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Searle v. Milburn Irrigation Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2006

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API