Wayman v. Murray City Corporation
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CROCKETT, Chief Justice.
In contest here are rights to water, as to amounts and pressure, in an underground water basin, known as the Murray Artesian Basin. It underlies an area in and adjacent to Murray City, lying between the Wasatch Mountains on the east and the Jordan River on the west. Plaintiffs are five families who own residences along Vine Street in Murray. Each has one or more smart wells (1}4> to 3 inches in diameter) of varying depths. Each owns established rights to take water by means of their wells approved by the State Engineer. The right of the defendant Murray City derives…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Schodde v. Twin Falls Land & Water Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Wrathall v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 1935
- Riordan v. WestwoodUtah Supreme Court · 1949
- Justesen v. OlsenUtah Supreme Court · 1935
- City of Colorado Springs v. BenderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Green River Canal Co. v. ThaynUtah Supreme Court · 2003
- Bingham v. Roosevelt City Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 2010
- Woodsum v. Pemberton Tp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1980
- Butler, Crockett & Walsh Development Corp. v. Pinecrest Pipeline Operating Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2004
- Salt Lake City v. Silver Fork Pipeline Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.