Legal Opinion
In re the Claim of Ricciardi v. Leather
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 6, 2003PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Cardona, EJ.
Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed April 16, 2002, which ruled that C.N.A. Insurance Company is responsible for claimant’s claim for workers’ compensation benefits.
*662Claimant was employed as a machine worker whose duties involved the repeated pressing of foot pedals. In 1997, he began experiencing pain and having difficulties with his left foot resulting in surgery in 1998. His treating orthopedist at that time, Vivian Chang, did not consider the problem to be work-related. Claimant returned to work but continued to experience foot pain. Orthopedist…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Claim of Carney v. Newburgh Park MotorsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Taylor v. Vassar CollegeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Claim of Druziak v. Town of AmsterdamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Claim of Schroeter v. Grand Hyatt HotelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Claim of Kobre v. AvrahamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
3Cited by8 opinions
- Claim of Hopkins v. Alcas Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Finchum v. ColaiacomoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Holloway v. West Street TruckingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Claim of Manticoff v. American Building MaintenanceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Claim of McGuinness v. John P. Picone, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.