Legal Opinion
Claim of Schroeter v. Grand Hyatt Hotel
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 10, 1999PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtYesawich Jr., J.
Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed October 27, 1997, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant was not entitled to claim concurrent employment.
Following a work-related injury to claimant sustained in 1987, accident, notice and causal relationship were established and, in November 1990, claimant’s average weekly wage was established based upon her earnings from the Grand Hyatt Hotel. She was awarded workers’ compensation benefits for periods of total disability and, thereafter, was classified partially disabled with an award continuing at a reduced earnings rate; the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Claim of Carney v. Newburgh Park MotorsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Taylor v. Vassar CollegeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Conley v. GravittAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Claim of Hampton v. Neptune Meter Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
3Cited by10 opinions
- Claim of Farcasin v. PDG, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Finchum v. ColaiacomoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- In re the Claim of Ricciardi v. LeatherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Claim of Kobre v. AvrahamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Nikolic v. Regent Wall Street HotelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.