Legal Opinion
Claim of Manticoff v. American Building Maintenance
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 11, 2009PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKavanagh, J.
Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed May 1, 2007, which, among other things, ruled that the doctrine of laches was not applicable against Reliance National Indemnity Company.
Claimant was injured in June 2000 when, during his employment as a janitor/custodian, he was lifting heavy boxes and suffered pain to his back, hip and legs. A C-2 form was filed by his employer, which indicated that CNA Insurance Companies (hereinafter RSKCo)1 was the employer’s workers’ compensation carrier. The Workers’ Compensation Board indexed the case in July 2000, and served notice on…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Claim of Hopkins v. Alcas Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Holloway v. West Street TruckingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- In re the Claim of Ricciardi v. LeatherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Claim of McGuinness v. John P. Picone, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Mangum v. National Union Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
3Cited by7 opinions
- Claim of Hopkins v. Alcas Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Claim of Sacco v. Mast Advertising/PublishingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Claim of Mlodozeniec v. Trio Asbestos Removal Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Matter of Trombino v. FMB Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
- Matter of Fuller v. JacksonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.