Legal Opinion

Claim of Druziak v. Town of Amsterdam

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 23, 1994PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMercure, J.

Appeals (1) from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed November 6, 1991, which *871denied Hartford Insurance Company’s application for rehearing based on newly discovered evidence, and (2) from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed April 10, 1992, which denied Hartford Insurance Company’s application for reconsideration or full Board review.

The relevant facts, as found by the Workers’ Compensation Board and supported by substantial evidence in the record, follow. Claimant, a volunteer fireman, sustained a right-knee injury on September 23, 1990 in connection with his…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Claim of Heustis v. TerieleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Claim of Cagle v. Judge Motor Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  2. Claim of Harris v. Phoenix Central School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  3. Claim of Hopkins v. Alcas Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  4. Claim of Hughes v. Steuben County Self-Insurance PlanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  5. Matter of Jie Cao v. Five Star Travel of NY Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API