Legal Opinion

Damon v. DeBar

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 1893PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Error to Saginaw. (Gage, J.) Assumpsit. -Defendants bring error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMcGrath, J.

'In this case plaintiff recovered a judgment of $11.40.

The case was before this Court in 83 Mich. 262, and it was there held that the circuit judge should have instructed the jury to render a verdict for the plaintiff. TJpon the second trial, upon substantially the same record, the circuit judge did direct a verdict, and defendants appeal.

It is insisted that the Court was misled upon the-' former hearing as to the’ points in dispute, and counsel for defendants close their brief with the following:

“We respectfully insist that the charge of the court on the other trial was correct.”

If counsel…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Newberry v. TrowbridgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1865
  2. Damon v. DeBarMichigan Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Muilenberg v. Upjohn Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. Taylor v. TaylorOregon Supreme Court · 1909
  3. American Insurance v. MartinekMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Leland v. FordMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Terrill v. Michigan United Traction Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1921

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API