Damon v. DeBar
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Saginaw. (Gage, J.) Assumpsit. -Defendants bring error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMcGrath, J.
'In this case plaintiff recovered a judgment of $11.40.
The case was before this Court in 83 Mich. 262, and it was there held that the circuit judge should have instructed the jury to render a verdict for the plaintiff. TJpon the second trial, upon substantially the same record, the circuit judge did direct a verdict, and defendants appeal.
It is insisted that the Court was misled upon the-' former hearing as to the’ points in dispute, and counsel for defendants close their brief with the following:
“We respectfully insist that the charge of the court on the other trial was correct.”
If counsel…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Newberry v. TrowbridgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1865
- Damon v. DeBarMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
3Cited by13 opinions
- Muilenberg v. Upjohn Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1988
- Taylor v. TaylorOregon Supreme Court · 1909
- American Insurance v. MartinekMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
- Leland v. FordMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
- Terrill v. Michigan United Traction Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1921
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.