Legal Opinion

Damon v. DeBar

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 14, 1890PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Saginaw. (Gage, J.) Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings error. The-facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.

This case originated in justice’s court upon a promissory note for $25, dated May 8, 1888. Plaintiff recovered judgment for $10.28, being the balance due upon the. note. Defendants appealed to the circuit court, where verdict and judgment were rendered in their favor, and plaintiff appealed to this Court.

The only defense is that the plaintiff promised, after the note became due, to receive in payment 200 posts for $10, and apply the same upon the note, and that defendant DeBar promised to get them out as soon as his fall work was done, and to have them ready upon his (De Bar’s) farm. This was…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Damon v. DeBarMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  2. First National Bank v. BurdickNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Summerall v. Covington Bros. Farm Loan & Inv. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  4. Adkins v. MorganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API