Legal Opinion

Muilenberg v. Upjohn Co.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided July 5, 1988No. Docket 93331PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJ. E. Mies, J.

Plaintiff appeals as of right from a January 27, 1986, jury verdict of no cause of action on his products liability claim arising from injuries allegedly suffered due to ingestion of a drug (Cleocin) produced and distributed by defendant. Plaintiff was diagnosed as having colitis in 1971 after taking Cleocin for treatment of severe acne. His condition eventually necessitated surgical removal of his large bowel in 1973. Plaintiff claimed that defendant failed to warn of the drug’s adverse side effects and was negligent in testing the drug.

This appeal is taken from the verdict in a second trial…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Mancusi v. StubbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Ben P. Fyke & Sons v. Gunter Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1973
  3. DiFranco v. PickardMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Marietta v. Cliffs Ridge, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Dunn v. Lederle LaboratoriesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Little v. Howard Johnson Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Maresh v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Mallory v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. Taylor v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. Reeves v. Cincinnati, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1995

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API