Legal Opinion

Newberry v. Trowbridge

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 1865PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error to Wayne Circuit. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

-Christianct J.:

This suit was brought in June, 1843, by the defend*270ants in error, and Robert Stewart, since deceased, (who were assignees of the Bank of Michigan,) against Oliver Newberry and Benjamin B. Kercheval. The declaration charged them as indorsers of a promissory note made by S. T. Jamieson, dated May 13, 1837, for $3,736, payable to the order of the defendants, at the Bank of Michigan, sixty days after the date thereof. The declaration states the indorsement as having been made by the defendants directly to the plaintiffs.. To this declaration the defendants pleaded the general…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sice v. CunninghamNew York Supreme Court · 1823
  2. Agan v. M'ManusNew York Supreme Court · 1814
  3. Newberry v. Trowbridge & OwenMichigan Supreme Court · 1857
  4. Crain v. ColwellNew York Supreme Court · 1811
  5. Austin v. BirchardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1859

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. County Treasurer v. BunburyMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Frazier v. RumisekMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Damon v. DeBarMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  4. State Bank of St. Johns v. McCabeMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Hamilton v. Winona Salt & Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1893

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API