Legal Opinion
Leland v. Ford
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided December 2, 1930No. Docket No. 85, Calendar No. 35,075PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.
An order denying a motion to dismiss the bill of complaint first filed in this case was re viewed by this court. Leland v. Ford, 245 Mich. 599. A motion for rehearing was denied. The bill was dismissed, but the cause remanded with leave to plaintiffs to apply for permission to file an amended bill which might cure the defects pointed out. Such permission was granted, and the bill now before us was filed. A motion to dismiss was granted by the trial court, and the decree made pursuant thereto is before us on appeal.
In the prevailing opinion filed on the former hearing (245 Mich. 607) it was…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Leland v. FordMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
- American Insurance v. MartinekMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
- Mynning v. Detroit, Lansing & Northern RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- Pierce v. UnderwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
- Damon v. DeBarMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Allen v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1975
- Topps-Toeller, Inc v. City of LansingMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
- Pierce v. RileyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
- Brewer v. StoddardMichigan Supreme Court · 1944
- Allen v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1975
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.