Parkhurst v. Healy's Estate
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtPowers, J.
The claimant asserts that she has a valid claim against the estate of Kate Healy, which she was prevented from presenting to the commissioners thereon through accident and mistake. She brought a petition under G. L. 3295 for the relief therein provided, which, after hearing, the probate court dismissed. She then appealed to the county court, and that court having refused her application, she brought the case here on exceptions.
The judgment against her will have to stand. In the first place, such a petition is, by the very terms of the statute, addressed to the discretion of the court. The…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- State v. LongSupreme Court of Vermont · 1922
- French v. WheldonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1916
- Lincoln v. Central Vermont Railway Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1909
- Adams v. AdamsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1849
- Dyer v. LalorSupreme Court of Vermont · 1920
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Parizo v. WilsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1929
- Shields v. Vermont Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1929
- State v. FairbanksSupreme Court of Vermont · 1928
- Belock v. State Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1934
- Capital Garage Co. v. PowellSupreme Court of Vermont · 1925
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.