Legal Opinion

State v. Fairbanks

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided January 13, 1928PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoulton, J.

The respondent, a married man, and the sheriff of Windsor County, was convicted of the crime of adultery, committed with Irma Stoodley, an unmarried woman, at Warren in Washington County, on July 18, 1926. He has brought the case to this Court on exceptions; and by a petition for a new trial in which he alleges newly discovered evidence.

The first exception briefed is one taken to the exclusion of a question asked by respondent’s counsel during the cross-examination of Irma Stoodley. In order clearly to understand the scope of this exception it is necessary to review a part of the testimony as…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Thayer v. ThayerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
  2. McAllister v. BenjaminSupreme Court of Vermont · 1923
  3. State v. BridgmanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1876
  4. State v. LongSupreme Court of Vermont · 1922
  5. State v. SlackSupreme Court of Vermont · 1897

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. State v. HoweSupreme Court of Vermont · 1978
  2. State v. StacySupreme Court of Vermont · 1932
  3. Parizo v. WilsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1929
  4. State v. LapanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1928
  5. United States v. Frank P. LaurelliCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1961

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API