Legal Opinion

Belock v. State Mutual Fire Insurance

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided October 2, 1934PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoulton, J.

This is an action of contract upon a policy of fire insurance covering certain property owned by the plaintiff Belock and mortgaged to the plaintiff Crampton, the loss being payable to the latter as his interest might appear. The plea is that the fire was caused by the fraudulent act of Belock, in that he wilfully burned or caused to be burned the insured building. This defense was available as against both Belock, the mortgagor, and Crampton, the mortgagee (Girard v. Vermont Mutual Fire Insurance Co., 103 Vt. 330, 334, 154 Atl. 666), but the burden of proving it was upon the defendant.…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Woodhouse v. Woodhouse Et Ux.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1925
  2. State v. StacySupreme Court of Vermont · 1932
  3. Smith v. MartinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1919
  4. Cummings v. Connecticut General Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1928
  5. French v. WheldonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1916

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Weeks v. BurnorSupreme Court of Vermont · 1974
  2. Duchaine, B.N.F. v. RaySupreme Court of Vermont · 1939
  3. Quigley v. City Court of the City of TucsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
  4. Grow v. WolcottSupreme Court of Vermont · 1963
  5. Towle v. St. Albans Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1960

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API