Legal Opinion

State v. Pauley

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 4, 2007No. CR0300333; A125151PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWollheim, J.

Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for attempted sexual abuse in the first degree. ORS 163.427. He argues that, under State v. Boots, 308 Or 371, 780 P2d 725 (1989), cert den, 510 US 1013 (1993), the trial court erred in failing to instruct the jury that 10 or more jurors must concur on the factual instance of attempted sexual contact underlying that charge. Defendant concedes that he failed to preserve that claim of error, but asks us to review it as plain error. We affirm.

In August 2002, the 15-year-old victim accepted a car ride from defendant, whom she had met on a few previous…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State v. LotchesOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State v. BootsOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  5. State v. RoseOregon Supreme Court · 1991

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. PayneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  2. State v. FreyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  3. State v. AshkinsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API